Support provided by:

Learn More

Documentaries

Articles

Podcasts

Topics

Business and Economy

Climate and Environment

Criminal Justice

Health

Immigration

Journalism Under Threat

Social Issues

U.S. Politics

War and Conflict

World

View All Topics

Documentaries

Boston Airport Tests ‘Chat Downs’ to Detect Suspicious Activity

Boston Airport Tests ‘Chat Downs’ to Detect Suspicious Activity
Boston Airport Tests ‘Chat Downs’ to Detect Suspicious Activity

By

Azmat Khan

August 18, 2011

If you are planning a trip in the near future through Boston’s Logan International Airport, you may want to consider the movement of your eyes, unusual perspiration and clicks of the tongue. Someone else may be.

These are some of the physical cues Transportation and Security Administration (TSA) personnel began monitoring this week in an effort to detect “suspicious activity” during interviews with every passenger at the airport’s security checkpoints.

Behavior detection officers have been trained to assess passengers’ “micro-expressions,” or facial expressions intended to conceal emotion.  TSA spokesman Nico Melendez told the Los Angeles Times they’re looking for “involuntary physical and physiological reactions that people exhibit in response to a fear of being discovered,” but didn’t elaborate further. (NPR has more on the facial expressions TSA is looking for.)

Boston Logan is the first airport to try out the program, which is modeled after a similar technique employed in Israel.  After a 60-day pilot period, the TSA will decide whether to implement it at other airports across the country.

University of Tennessee law professor Glenn Reynolds warns that behavior detection techniques are difficult to teach, and questions whether TSA officers will be able to employ them effectively.

Democrats on the House Homeland Security Committee have also criticized the program.  Chief among them is Representative Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), who wrote this letter [PDF] to TSA Administrator John Pistole arguing the program has no scientific validation.

Back in January we explored how difficult it can be to define and detect “suspicious activity” in  Are We Safer.  Suspicious behavior identified by government and law enforcement organizations ranged from “individuals who order food at a restaurant and leave before the food arrives” and  “joggers who stand and stretch for an inordinate amount of time” (LAPD) to “drivers who operate the vehicle in an overly cautious manner, attempt to abandon the vehicle or act nervously” (Maryland Coordination and Analysis Center).

Terrorism

Email:

FrontlineEditors@wgbh.org
Journalistic Standards

Related Documentaries

Are We Safer?

Are We Safer?

21m

Latest Documentaries

Related Stories

Related Stories

Get our Newsletter

Thank you! Your subscription request has been received.

Stay Connected

Explore

FRONTLINE Journalism Fund

Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation

Koo and Patricia Yuen

FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Web Site Copyright ©1995-2025 WGBH Educational Foundation. PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Additional funding is provided by the Abrams Foundation; Park Foundation; the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation, and additional support from Koo and Patricia Yuen. FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Web Site Copyright ©1995-2025 WGBH Educational Foundation. PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.

PBS logo
Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo
Abrams Foundation logo
PARK Foundation logo
MacArthur Foundation logo
Heising-Simons Foundation logo