Support provided by:

Learn More

Documentaries

Articles

Podcasts

Topics

Business and Economy

Climate and Environment

Criminal Justice

Health

Immigration

Journalism Under Threat

Social Issues

U.S. Politics

War and Conflict

World

View All Topics

Documentaries

Five Salmonella Outbreaks Food Inspectors Didn’t See Coming

Five Salmonella Outbreaks Food Inspectors Didn’t See Coming
Five Salmonella Outbreaks Food Inspectors Didn’t See Coming

By

Emma Schwartz
Chris Amico
David Donald

May 14, 2015

Federal inspectors are inside every meat and poultry processing plant in this country. The problem is, their efforts sometimes fail to identify salmonella — a potentially deadly pathogen that sickens more than a million Americans each year, about 200,000 from contaminated poultry.

The five cases detailed below offer a window into why. Each example represents a multi-state salmonella outbreak linked to chicken or turkey. In each case, government officials were able to trace contaminated poultry back to specific processing plants. But in all five cases, routine testing in the six months before people began falling sick didn’t detect signs of salmonella problems that could lead to outbreaks.

How is that possible?

One explanation can be found in the way inspectors with the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) oversee poultry.

When it comes to salmonella, the FSIS tests fewer than one bird per day in plants that can process up to hundreds of thousands of birds per day. And even when they do test, inspectors aren’t measuring the amount of the bacteria or the type found. Some poultry products aren’t tested at all.

Take the example of Foster Farms, the largest poultry producer on the West Coast. From March 2013 to July 2014, a salmonella outbreak linked to three of the company’s processing plants sickened 634 people. But testing of whole chickens in each of these plants prior to the outbreak turned up no positive tests for salmonella. That’s according to an analysis by FRONTLINE and the Investigative Reporting Workshop based on USDA data obtained by BuzzFeed News through a Freedom of Information Act request.

In their investigation of the outbreak, officials at the FSIS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention learned that most of those sickened had eaten chicken sold as parts — breasts, wings or thighs. That discovery highlighted another gap in the nation’s food safety system — chicken parts weren’t subject to salmonella limits. Earlier this year, FSIS proposed limits on chicken parts for the first time.

Other times, inspectors did find salmonella ahead of an outbreak, but the amount they found was allowed under existing federal standards. So even though a company’s product was making people sick, they weren’t in violation of the FSIS limits.

Ultimately, the contamination problems in each of the five cases were found and fixed, but only after consumers were sickened, some severely, from salmonella poisoning.

An FSIS spokesperson said in a statement to FRONTLINE that the agency has been making changes to its testing and inspection system to try to catch more problems.

“Since the very beginning of this Administration, there has been a noticeable shift at USDA toward prevention-based food safety policies. We are continually working to develop tools that will allow us to detect developing problems and fix them before they can cause illnesses,” said the spokesman, Adam Tarr. (Read the full statement below.)

[pym src=”https://cms.prod.frol.us/wgbh/frontline/interactive/salmonella-outbreaks/index.html”]

FSIS’s full statement to FRONTLINE:

Since the very beginning of this Administration, there has been a noticeable shift at USDA toward prevention-based food safety policies. We are continually working to develop tools that will allow us to detect developing problems and fix them before they can cause illnesses. If a problem does occur, we attack it aggressively, not hesitating to use innovative approaches to resolve the problem as quickly as possible. We are also continually learning from our experiences and making changes to our policies and practices to prevent problems that we have seen from happening again. Specifically:

  • FSIS now schedules intensive investigations, known as Food Safety Assessments, which are conducted by specially trained employees, at any plant that has a high number of food safety non-compliances or that fails to meet an Agency-established performance standard. The agency’s central, automated data system has made it possible to detect these developments and to act quickly to address them.
  • Following the two recalls for ground poultry products in 2011, FSIS conducted investigations at the plants involved and publicly shared its findings from the investigations. FSIS also conducted special investigations at all ground poultry processing facilities and instructed ground poultry plants to update their food safety plans to address the weaknesses identified.
  • The agency now tests all poultry plants continuously, taking samples every week on a random day so that companies cannot predict when the samples will be taken. Previously, FSIS conducted sample sets for 51 consecutive days, and companies that performed well could have gaps between each set (poor performers were tested more frequently).
  • The agency is now testing poultry parts in addition to whole carcasses. New performance standards will be implemented this year that are expected to prevent 50,000 illnesses annually. Performance standards have proven to be effective at lowering Salmonella rates on whole carcasses. By developing additional standards, and strengthening existing ones, we believe that outbreaks will be averted.
Climate and Environment
Emma Schwartz

Producer & Reporter

Chris Amico

Former Interactive Editor

Email:

FrontlineEditors@wgbh.org
Journalistic Standards

Related Documentaries

The Trouble with Chicken

54m

Latest Documentaries

Related Stories

Related Stories

Get our Newsletter

Thank you! Your subscription request has been received.

Stay Connected

Explore

FRONTLINE Journalism Fund

Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation

Koo and Patricia Yuen

FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Web Site Copyright ©1995-2025 WGBH Educational Foundation. PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Additional funding is provided by the Abrams Foundation; Park Foundation; the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation, and additional support from Koo and Patricia Yuen. FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Web Site Copyright ©1995-2025 WGBH Educational Foundation. PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.

PBS logo
Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo
Abrams Foundation logo
PARK Foundation logo
MacArthur Foundation logo
Heising-Simons Foundation logo