Support provided by:

Learn More

Documentaries

Articles

Podcasts

Topics

Business and Economy

Climate and Environment

Criminal Justice

Health

Immigration

Journalism Under Threat

Social Issues

U.S. Politics

War and Conflict

World

View All Topics

Documentaries

Is California’s Medical Marijuana Crackdown Coming to Colorado?

Is California’s Medical Marijuana Crackdown Coming to Colorado?
Is California’s Medical Marijuana Crackdown Coming to Colorado?

By

Azmat Khan

December 16, 2011

A coordinated, statewide crackdown on medical marijuana might soon find its way to Colorado.

In October, the federal government launched a coordinated offensive against dispensaries in California — the country’s largest marijuana market — announcing a series of civil forfeiture lawsuits and warning dozens to shut down or face criminal charges and confiscation of property. In San Diego alone, 62 percent of dispensaries have reportedly closed since the crackdown began.

A law enforcement official told the Associated Press earlier this week that the federal government is considering a similar crackdown early next year in Colorado, a state that has some of the nation’s most comprehensive medical marijuana regulations. According to the AP,  “the official spoke on condition of anonymity and did not provide details because the matter is under review.”

The AP’s story follows Denver station KCNC-TV’s report that medical marijuana dispensaries within 1,000 feet of schools will receive warning letters to either shut down or move their operations within 45 days, or face prosecution. According to the station:

Many of the state’s dispensaries that are closer than 1,000 feet to a school have already been approved to be there under local laws. They usually have been grandfathered in.

Earlier this fall, Colorado became the first state in the nation to issue medical marijuana business licenses. Medical marijuana advocates credit the state’s comprehensive cannabis regulations with having protected businesses thus far from federal raids taking place in other states.

“Colorado has been a model for how a state should regulate medical marijuana,” Brian Vicente, a member of the medical marijuana advocacy group Sensible Colorado, told the AP. “Our system has worked and Colorado should be allowed to continue to do so.”

Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.), who represents the state’s second district, also emphasized the state’s “strict regulatory system,” telling The Huffington Post:

There are more pressing issues facing federal law enforcement so it makes no sense for them to waste time and taxpayer money interfering with state-legal businesses that voters have approved, that are well-regulated, and that generate jobs and economic activity.

On Dec. 9, Public Policy Polling released a report showing that Coloradans favor legalizing marijuana in general (49 percent) and overwhelmingly believe it should be available for medical purposes (68 percent).  Nationwide, 50 percent of Americans say marijuana should be legalized and 70 percent favor legalizing medical marijuana to alleviate pain and suffering.

Over the past nine months, the federal government has taken a number of steps to crack down on medical marijuana around the country. At the heart of the broader crackdown is a battle between state and federal laws that will likely continue to play out.

Sixteen states and the District of Columbia have passed medical marijuana laws, and more than a third of all states are experimenting with some form of legalization or decriminalization.

Social Issues

Email:

FrontlineEditors@wgbh.org
Journalistic Standards

Related Documentaries

The Pot Republic

The Pot Republic

24m

Latest Documentaries

Related Stories

Related Stories

Get our Newsletter

Thank you! Your subscription request has been received.

Stay Connected

Explore

FRONTLINE Journalism Fund

Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation

Koo and Patricia Yuen

FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Web Site Copyright ©1995-2025 WGBH Educational Foundation. PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.

Funding for FRONTLINE is provided through the support of PBS viewers and by the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. Additional funding is provided by the Abrams Foundation; Park Foundation; the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation; and the FRONTLINE Journalism Fund with major support from Jon and Jo Ann Hagler on behalf of the Jon L. Hagler Foundation, and additional support from Koo and Patricia Yuen. FRONTLINE is a registered trademark of WGBH Educational Foundation. Web Site Copyright ©1995-2025 WGBH Educational Foundation. PBS is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.

PBS logo
Corporation for Public Broadcasting logo
Abrams Foundation logo
PARK Foundation logo
MacArthur Foundation logo
Heising-Simons Foundation logo